<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interview with Jim Gettys - VP of Software Engineering - OLPC</title>
	<link>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 22:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Bodley</title>
		<link>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1907</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Bodley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1907</guid>
		<description>Hard to believe that there aren't more comments! Jim is a VIP in software.

I'm a volunteer for OLPC, although getting seriously involved is still in the future. Jim's interview helped me considerably to better understand the machine's software; machine overviews are not so easy to find, imho. I'm still encountering pleasant surprises as I learn more.

I sub'd to Walter Bender's Community News some months ago, and can't help but be impressed with the amount of work that went into enhancing [suspend] and [resume]. (Jim's now writing it.)

Point I want to make (and hope I'm correct!) is that the XO (brief name for the OLPC machine) saves (apparently a lot of) power by suspending as soon as it can, and also resumes very quickly. (Afaik, both are in the low 100s of ms range.) Goal is apparently to make S &#38; R essentially unnoticeable to the user. S &#38; R, as I now understand it, happen while an activity is open and running (such as during pauses in keying)as well as when the machine is temporarily being unused.

Musing: Will S &#38; R ever be so fast that the machine will suspend between keystrokes while typing at a good clip?

"Jim: Other than worrying about power management and suspended resume in a serious..."

I think there was a minor transcription error, there, and Jim, quite understandably, probably didn't realize at that moment that S &#38; R is not something a reader of this interview would necessarily realize the significance of.

(20080625)

Best regards,
nb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard to believe that there aren&#8217;t more comments! Jim is a VIP in software.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a volunteer for OLPC, although getting seriously involved is still in the future. Jim&#8217;s interview helped me considerably to better understand the machine&#8217;s software; machine overviews are not so easy to find, imho. I&#8217;m still encountering pleasant surprises as I learn more.</p>
<p>I sub&#8217;d to Walter Bender&#8217;s Community News some months ago, and can&#8217;t help but be impressed with the amount of work that went into enhancing [suspend] and [resume]. (Jim&#8217;s now writing it.)</p>
<p>Point I want to make (and hope I&#8217;m correct!) is that the XO (brief name for the OLPC machine) saves (apparently a lot of) power by suspending as soon as it can, and also resumes very quickly. (Afaik, both are in the low 100s of ms range.) Goal is apparently to make S &amp; R essentially unnoticeable to the user. S &amp; R, as I now understand it, happen while an activity is open and running (such as during pauses in keying)as well as when the machine is temporarily being unused.</p>
<p>Musing: Will S &amp; R ever be so fast that the machine will suspend between keystrokes while typing at a good clip?</p>
<p>&#8220;Jim: Other than worrying about power management and suspended resume in a serious&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I think there was a minor transcription error, there, and Jim, quite understandably, probably didn&#8217;t realize at that moment that S &amp; R is not something a reader of this interview would necessarily realize the significance of.</p>
<p>(20080625)</p>
<p>Best regards,<br />
nb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Bodley</title>
		<link>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1906</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Bodley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1906</guid>
		<description>Sorry for a duplicate comment; slow contact bounce in my left mouse button?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for a duplicate comment; slow contact bounce in my left mouse button?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicholas Bodley</title>
		<link>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1905</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicholas Bodley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://howsoftwareisbuilt.com/2008/04/21/interview-with-jim-gettys-vp-of-software-engineering-olpc/#comment-1905</guid>
		<description>In your list of people interviewed, there's a bizarre misspelling that must have gone unnoticed for a while; see "Ereknkrantz". That extra "k" is a dilly.
Just what this implies about how we read and general literacy, I'm not sure.

Regards,
nb

(No need to post this, btw.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your list of people interviewed, there&#8217;s a bizarre misspelling that must have gone unnoticed for a while; see &#8220;Ereknkrantz&#8221;. That extra &#8220;k&#8221; is a dilly.<br />
Just what this implies about how we read and general literacy, I&#8217;m not sure.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
nb</p>
<p>(No need to post this, btw.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
